The argument that "it's complicated" is absurd. "Never again" was meant universally—Israel does not get to justify its actions based on past suffering. Me: The idea of a "Jewish people" is a deception. Judaism is a religion, not an ethnicity. There is no such thing as an "Abrahamic people"—whether Jewish, Christian, or Muslim. No one speaks of "Buddhist peoples" or "Hindu peoples." A people is never defined by religion; the spiritual individual stands above material identifications. Metaphysical part: THE LIMITS OF INITIATIC REGULARITY. Among the few Western writers who—not through mere scholarship but by virtue of effective knowledge grounded in initiation—have contributed to the clarification of esoteric sciences and traditional spirituality, René Guénon holds a prominent position. Generally, we recommend Guénon’s works to our readers, as they are unparalleled in their kind and value, and they can serve as a complement to much of what we have expounded, at least in terms of essentials. However, concerning certain particular aspects, we must express reservations, as Guénon’s orientation often reflects a line of thought divergent from the basis of our own formulations. Moreover, Guénon’s approach is essentially theoretical, whereas ours is fundamentally practical. It will therefore be useful to briefly clarify the distinctions in this domain, so that our followers may discern how to properly utilize Guénon’s contributions. As for doctrinal divergences, we will only allude to them without elaboration. We do not share Guénon’s views on the relationship between royal and sacerdotal initiation, his framework concerning the Lesser and Greater Mysteries, or his restrictive and pejorative use of the term "Magic." These three points are, to some extent, interconnected. But our primary focus here is the general problem of initiation. ### The Guénonian Schema of Initiatic Regularity In René Guénon’s view, initiation entails transcending the human condition